Jason Keeley & Bryan Nielsen Affiliate Disclosure Statement Plugin up to 0.3 on WordPress cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Jason Keeley & Bryan Nielsen Affiliate Disclosure Statement Plugin up to 0.3 on WordPress. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2025-22552. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Jason Keeley & Bryan Nielsen Affiliate Disclosure Statement Plugin up to 0.3 on WordPress. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jason Keeley, Bryan Nielsen Affiliate Disclosure Statement allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Affiliate Disclosure Statement: from n/a through 0.3.
The weakness was shared by Soprobro. The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-22552 since 01/07/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.6
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.1
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/07/2025 🔍01/07/2025 🔍
01/07/2025 🔍
02/15/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Soprobro
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-22552 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-22552
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-290589
Entry
Created: 01/07/2025 17:33Updated: 02/15/2025 06:46
Changes: 01/07/2025 17:33 (64), 02/15/2025 06:46 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.