| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Mozilla Firefox up to 133.x. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component ALPN. The manipulation leads to certificate validation. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2025-0239. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Mozilla Firefox up to 133.x. This issue affects an unknown function of the component ALPN. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a certificate validation vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-295. The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
When using Alt-Svc, ALPN did not properly validate certificates when the original server is redirecting to an insecure site. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 134, Firefox ESR 128.6, Thunderbird 134, and Thunderbird 128.6.
It is possible to read the advisory at bugzilla.mozilla.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-0239 since 01/06/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/15/2026). The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1587.003 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 213532 (Mozilla Firefox ESR < 128.6), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
Upgrading to version 134 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Tenable (213532). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.mozilla.org/
- Product: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.0
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.0
CNA Vector (mozilla): 🔍
ADP CISA Base Score: 4.0
ADP CISA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Certificate validationCWE: CWE-295 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 213532
Nessus Name: Mozilla Firefox ESR < 128.6
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Firefox 134
Timeline
01/06/2025 🔍01/07/2025 🔍
01/07/2025 🔍
04/15/2026 🔍
Sources
Vendor: mozilla.orgProduct: mozilla.org
Advisory: bugzilla.mozilla.org
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-0239 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-0239
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-290675
Entry
Created: 01/07/2025 18:56Updated: 04/15/2026 04:43
Changes: 01/07/2025 18:56 (56), 01/08/2025 00:20 (2), 01/09/2025 11:43 (11), 02/14/2025 17:48 (3), 04/15/2026 04:43 (12)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.