HPE Aruba Networking AOS up to 8.10.0.14/8.12.0.2/10.4.1.4 command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in HPE Aruba Networking AOS up to 8.10.0.14/8.12.0.2/10.4.1.4. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to command injection. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2025-23052. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in HPE Aruba Networking AOS up to 8.10.0.14/8.12.0.2/10.4.1.4. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a command injection vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-77. The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Authenticated command injection vulnerability in the command line interface of a network management service. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system.
The advisory is shared at support.hpe.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-23052 since 01/10/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are necessary for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 01/24/2025). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 8.10.0.0
- 8.10.0.1
- 8.10.0.2
- 8.10.0.3
- 8.10.0.4
- 8.10.0.5
- 8.10.0.6
- 8.10.0.7
- 8.10.0.8
- 8.10.0.9
- 8.10.0.10
- 8.10.0.11
- 8.10.0.12
- 8.10.0.13
- 8.10.0.14
- 8.12.0.0
- 8.12.0.1
- 8.12.0.2
- 10.4.1.0
- 10.4.1.1
- 10.4.1.2
- 10.4.1.3
- 10.4.1.4
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.hpe.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Base Score: 7.2
VulDB Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.2
CNA Vector (hpe): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Command injectionCWE: CWE-77 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/10/2025 🔍01/14/2025 🔍
01/14/2025 🔍
01/24/2025 🔍
Sources
Vendor: hpe.comAdvisory: support.hpe.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-23052 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-23052
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-291653
Entry
Created: 01/14/2025 19:09Updated: 01/24/2025 09:22
Changes: 01/14/2025 19:09 (61), 01/24/2025 09:22 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.