| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Webtoolmaster Software WinHKI 1.6. This impacts an unknown function. This manipulation causes path traversal. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2006-1323. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Webtoolmaster Software WinHKI 1.6. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-22. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Directory traversal vulnerability in WinHKI 1.6 and earlier allows user-assisted attackers to overwrite arbitrary files via a (1) RAR, (2) TAR, (3) ZIP, or (4) TAR.GZ archive with a file whose file name contains ".." sequences.
The weakness was shared 03/20/2006 by Hamid Ebadi (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2006-1323 since 03/20/2006. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1006 for this issue.
It is possible to download the exploit at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (25335), SecurityFocus (BID 17153†) and Secunia (SA19296†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Base Score: 5.6
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/24/2006 🔍03/20/2006 🔍
03/20/2006 🔍
03/20/2006 🔍
03/20/2006 🔍
03/12/2015 🔍
07/21/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: Hamid Ebadi
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2006-1323 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2006-1323
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-29269
X-Force: 25335 - WinHKI archive extraction directory traversal
SecurityFocus: 17153 - WinHKI Remote Directory Traversal Vulnerability
Secunia: 19296 - WinHKI Multiple Archive Directory Traversal Vulnerability, Less Critical
Vupen: ADV-2006-1010
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 03/12/2015 12:19Updated: 07/21/2018 10:31
Changes: 03/12/2015 12:19 (52), 07/21/2018 10:31 (9)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.