AI Power Plugin up to 1.8.96 on WordPress wpaicg_export_prompts code injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in AI Power Plugin up to 1.8.96 on WordPress. Affected by this vulnerability is the function wpaicg_export_prompts. Performing a manipulation results in code injection.
This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-0428. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in AI Power Plugin up to 1.8.96 on WordPress. It has been classified as critical. This affects the function wpaicg_export_prompts. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a code injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-94. The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The "AI Power: Complete AI Pack" plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in versions up to, and including, 1.8.96 via deserialization of untrusted input from the $form['post_content'] variable through the wpaicg_export_prompts function. This allows authenticated attackers, with administrative privileges, to inject a PHP Object. No POP chain is present in the vulnerable plugin. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it could allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code.
It is possible to read the advisory at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-0428 since 01/13/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 01/22/2025). The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
Version
- 1.8.0
- 1.8.1
- 1.8.2
- 1.8.3
- 1.8.4
- 1.8.5
- 1.8.6
- 1.8.7
- 1.8.8
- 1.8.9
- 1.8.10
- 1.8.11
- 1.8.12
- 1.8.13
- 1.8.14
- 1.8.15
- 1.8.16
- 1.8.17
- 1.8.18
- 1.8.19
- 1.8.20
- 1.8.21
- 1.8.22
- 1.8.23
- 1.8.24
- 1.8.25
- 1.8.26
- 1.8.27
- 1.8.28
- 1.8.29
- 1.8.30
- 1.8.31
- 1.8.32
- 1.8.33
- 1.8.34
- 1.8.35
- 1.8.36
- 1.8.37
- 1.8.38
- 1.8.39
- 1.8.40
- 1.8.41
- 1.8.42
- 1.8.43
- 1.8.44
- 1.8.45
- 1.8.46
- 1.8.47
- 1.8.48
- 1.8.49
- 1.8.50
- 1.8.51
- 1.8.52
- 1.8.53
- 1.8.54
- 1.8.55
- 1.8.56
- 1.8.57
- 1.8.58
- 1.8.59
- 1.8.60
- 1.8.61
- 1.8.62
- 1.8.63
- 1.8.64
- 1.8.65
- 1.8.66
- 1.8.67
- 1.8.68
- 1.8.69
- 1.8.70
- 1.8.71
- 1.8.72
- 1.8.73
- 1.8.74
- 1.8.75
- 1.8.76
- 1.8.77
- 1.8.78
- 1.8.79
- 1.8.80
- 1.8.81
- 1.8.82
- 1.8.83
- 1.8.84
- 1.8.85
- 1.8.86
- 1.8.87
- 1.8.88
- 1.8.89
- 1.8.90
- 1.8.91
- 1.8.92
- 1.8.93
- 1.8.94
- 1.8.95
- 1.8.96
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.2
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Code injectionCWE: CWE-94 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/13/2025 🔍01/21/2025 🔍
01/21/2025 🔍
01/22/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-0428 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-0428
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-292875
Entry
Created: 01/21/2025 23:00Updated: 01/22/2025 09:45
Changes: 01/21/2025 23:00 (52), 01/22/2025 09:45 (10)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.