DLX Plugins Comment Edit Core Plugin up to 3.0.33 on WordPress server-side request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in DLX Plugins Comment Edit Core Plugin up to 3.0.33 on WordPress. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation results in server-side request forgery. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-24703. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in DLX Plugins Comment Edit Core Plugin up to 3.0.33 on WordPress. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in DLX Plugins Comment Edit Core – Simple Comment Editing allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Comment Edit Core – Simple Comment Editing: from n/a through 3.0.33.
The weakness was published by Marek Mikita. The advisory is available at patchstack.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2025-24703 since 01/23/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation requires an enhanced level of successful authentication. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not available. The structure of the vulnerability defines a possible price range of USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 01/24/2025).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 3.0.0
- 3.0.1
- 3.0.2
- 3.0.3
- 3.0.4
- 3.0.5
- 3.0.6
- 3.0.7
- 3.0.8
- 3.0.9
- 3.0.10
- 3.0.11
- 3.0.12
- 3.0.13
- 3.0.14
- 3.0.15
- 3.0.16
- 3.0.17
- 3.0.18
- 3.0.19
- 3.0.20
- 3.0.21
- 3.0.22
- 3.0.23
- 3.0.24
- 3.0.25
- 3.0.26
- 3.0.27
- 3.0.28
- 3.0.29
- 3.0.30
- 3.0.31
- 3.0.32
- 3.0.33
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.5
VulDB Base Score: 4.7
VulDB Temp Score: 4.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.4
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Server-side request forgeryCWE: CWE-918
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/23/2025 🔍01/24/2025 🔍
01/24/2025 🔍
01/24/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Marek Mikita
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-24703 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-24703
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-293370
Entry
Created: 01/24/2025 20:44Changes: 01/24/2025 20:44 (64)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.