HasThemes Extensions for CF7 Plugin up to 3.2.0 on WordPress server-side request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in HasThemes Extensions for CF7 Plugin up to 3.2.0 on WordPress and classified as critical. The affected element is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-24695. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in HasThemes Extensions for CF7 Plugin up to 3.2.0 on WordPress and classified as critical. This issue affects an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes Extensions For CF7 allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Extensions For CF7: from n/a through 3.2.0.
The weakness was disclosed by Marek Mikita. It is possible to read the advisory at patchstack.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-24695 since 01/23/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are required for exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 01/24/2026).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.5
VulDB Base Score: 4.7
VulDB Temp Score: 4.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.4
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Server-side request forgeryCWE: CWE-918
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/23/2025 🔍01/24/2025 🔍
01/24/2025 🔍
01/24/2026 🔍
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Marek Mikita
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-24695 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-24695
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-293387
Entry
Created: 01/24/2025 20:51Updated: 01/24/2026 04:22
Changes: 01/24/2025 20:51 (64), 01/24/2026 04:22 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.