skyverge Custom Product Tabs Lite for WooCommerce Plugin up to 1.9.0 on WordPress frs_woo_product_tabs deserialization
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in skyverge Custom Product Tabs Lite for WooCommerce Plugin up to 1.9.0 on WordPress. The impacted element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation of the argument frs_woo_product_tabs results in deserialization. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2024-12600. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in skyverge Custom Product Tabs Lite for WooCommerce Plugin up to 1.9.0 on WordPress. This affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument frs_woo_product_tabs with an unknown input leads to a deserialization vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-502. The product deserializes untrusted data without sufficiently verifying that the resulting data will be valid. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The Custom Product Tabs Lite for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.0 via deserialization of untrusted input from the 'frs_woo_product_tabs' parameter. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Shop Manager-level access and above, to inject a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it could allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code.
The weakness was released by Francesco Carlucci. The advisory is shared at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-12600 since 12/13/2024. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploitation needs additional levels of successful authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 01/25/2025).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Base Score: 4.7
VulDB Temp Score: 4.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.2
CNA Vector (Wordfence): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: DeserializationCWE: CWE-502 / CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/13/2024 🔍01/25/2025 🔍
01/25/2025 🔍
01/25/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comResearcher: Francesco Carlucci
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-12600 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-12600
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-293421
Entry
Created: 01/25/2025 07:57Changes: 01/25/2025 07:57 (64)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.