ays-pro Survey Maker Plugin up to 5.1.3.3 on WordPress ays_sections[5][questions][8][title] cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability categorized as problematic has been discovered in ays-pro Survey Maker Plugin up to 5.1.3.3 on WordPress. The impacted element is an unknown function. Executing a manipulation of the argument ays_sections[5][questions][8][title] can lead to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2024-13505. The attack can be executed remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in ays-pro Survey Maker Plugin up to 5.1.3.3 on WordPress and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument ays_sections[5][questions][8][title] with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. CVE summarizes:
The Survey Maker plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘ays_sections[5][questions][8][title]’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.3.3 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.
The weakness was released by Joel Indra. The advisory is shared for download at wordfence.com. This vulnerability was named CVE-2024-13505 since 01/17/2025. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploitation needs additional levels of successful authentication. Successful exploitation requires user interaction by the victim. There are known technical details, but no exploit is available. The MITRE ATT&CK project declares the attack technique as T1059.007.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Base Score: 2.4
VulDB Temp Score: 2.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 5.5
CNA Vector (Wordfence): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/17/2025 🔍01/26/2025 🔍
01/26/2025 🔍
02/08/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comResearcher: Joel Indra
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-13505 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-13505
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-293476
Entry
Created: 01/26/2025 16:28Updated: 02/08/2025 19:20
Changes: 01/26/2025 16:28 (65), 02/08/2025 19:20 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.