Eniture Technology LTL Freight Quotes Plugin up to 5.0.20 on WordPress sql injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Eniture Technology LTL Freight Quotes Plugin up to 5.0.20 on WordPress. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to sql injection. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2025-24664. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Eniture Technology LTL Freight Quotes Plugin up to 5.0.20 on WordPress. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a sql injection vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-89. The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Eniture Technology LTL Freight Quotes – Worldwide Express Edition allows SQL Injection. This issue affects LTL Freight Quotes – Worldwide Express Edition: from n/a through 5.0.20.
The weakness was published by Colin Xu. The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-24664 since 01/23/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 01/27/2025). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1505 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 5.0.0
- 5.0.1
- 5.0.2
- 5.0.3
- 5.0.4
- 5.0.5
- 5.0.6
- 5.0.7
- 5.0.8
- 5.0.9
- 5.0.10
- 5.0.11
- 5.0.12
- 5.0.13
- 5.0.14
- 5.0.15
- 5.0.16
- 5.0.17
- 5.0.18
- 5.0.19
- 5.0.20
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.2
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 9.3
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Sql injectionCWE: CWE-89 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/23/2025 🔍01/27/2025 🔍
01/27/2025 🔍
01/27/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Colin Xu
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-24664 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-24664
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-293525
Entry
Created: 01/27/2025 15:41Updated: 01/27/2025 15:44
Changes: 01/27/2025 15:41 (29), 01/27/2025 15:44 (35)
Complete: 🔍
Committer: mitr
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.