snowflakedb snowflake-jdbc up to 3.21.0 on Windows untrusted search path
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in snowflakedb snowflake-jdbc up to 3.21.0 on Windows. It has been rated as problematic. This affects an unknown part. Performing a manipulation results in untrusted search path. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2025-24789. The attack is only possible with local access. There is not any exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in snowflakedb snowflake-jdbc up to 3.21.0 on Windows. This affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a untrusted search path vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-426. The product searches for critical resources using an externally-supplied search path that can point to resources that are not under the product's direct control. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Snowflake JDBC provides a JDBC type 4 driver that supports core functionality, allowing Java program to connect to Snowflake. Snowflake discovered and remediated a vulnerability in the Snowflake JDBC Driver. When the EXTERNALBROWSER authentication method is used on Windows, an attacker with write access to a directory in the %PATH% can escalate their privileges to the user that runs the vulnerable JDBC Driver version. This vulnerability affects versions 3.2.3 through 3.21.0 on Windows. Snowflake fixed the issue in version 3.22.0.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-24789 since 01/23/2025. The exploitability is told to be difficult. An attack has to be approached locally. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1574 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 3.22.0 eliminates this vulnerability. Applying the patch 4f01bb8f9b708c71e7a2111c87371dbfc1d53dd6 is able to eliminate this problem. The bugfix is ready for download at github.com. The best possible mitigation is suggested to be upgrading to the latest version.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Base Score: 7.0
VulDB Temp Score: 6.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.8
CNA Vector (GitHub_M): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Untrusted search pathCWE: CWE-426
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: snowflake-jdbc 3.22.0
Patch: 4f01bb8f9b708c71e7a2111c87371dbfc1d53dd6
Timeline
01/23/2025 🔍01/29/2025 🔍
01/29/2025 🔍
08/20/2025 🔍
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: GHSA-7hpq-3g6w-pvhf
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-24789 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-24789
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-294021
Entry
Created: 01/29/2025 23:09Updated: 08/20/2025 23:21
Changes: 01/29/2025 23:09 (67), 08/20/2025 23:21 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.