Geovision GV-ASWeb up to 6.1.1.0 Account Management cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Geovision GV-ASWeb up to 6.1.1.0. It has been rated as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Account Management. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2024-56901. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Geovision GV-ASWeb up to 6.1.1.0 and classified as problematic. This issue affects an unknown function of the component Account Management. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the Account Management component of Geovision GV-ASWeb version 6.1.1.0 or less allows attackers to arbitrarily create Admin accounts via a crafted GET request method.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-56901 since 01/09/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
The exploit is available at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (52187) and EUVD (EUVD-2024-53445). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/09/2025 🔍02/03/2025 🔍
02/03/2025 🔍
06/23/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-56901 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-56901
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-294539
EUVD: 🔍
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 02/03/2025 23:06Updated: 06/23/2025 02:33
Changes: 02/03/2025 23:06 (53), 02/06/2025 02:37 (3), 03/04/2025 01:21 (1), 06/11/2025 14:47 (11), 06/23/2025 02:33 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.