Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager up to 2024.3.19 on Windows certificate validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager up to 2024.3.19 on Windows. This issue affects some unknown processing. Performing a manipulation results in certificate validation. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2025-1193. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager up to 2024.3.19 on Windows. This affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a certificate validation vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-295. The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Improper host validation in the certificate validation component in Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager on 2024.3.19 and earlier on Windows allows an attacker to intercept and modify encrypted communications via a man-in-the-middle attack by presenting a certificate for a different host.
The advisory is shared at devolutions.net. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-1193 since 02/10/2025. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1587.003 for this issue.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 216584 (Devolutions Remote Desktop < 2024.3.20.0 Improper Certificate Validation (DEVO-2025-0001)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Tenable (216584). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 2024.3.0
- 2024.3.1
- 2024.3.2
- 2024.3.3
- 2024.3.4
- 2024.3.5
- 2024.3.6
- 2024.3.7
- 2024.3.8
- 2024.3.9
- 2024.3.10
- 2024.3.11
- 2024.3.12
- 2024.3.13
- 2024.3.14
- 2024.3.15
- 2024.3.16
- 2024.3.17
- 2024.3.18
- 2024.3.19
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.7
VulDB Base Score: 3.7
VulDB Temp Score: 3.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Certificate validationCWE: CWE-295 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 216584
Nessus Name: Devolutions Remote Desktop < 2024.3.20.0 Improper Certificate Validation (DEVO-2025-0001)
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/10/2025 🔍02/10/2025 🔍
02/10/2025 🔍
02/21/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: DEVO-2025-0001Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-1193 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-1193
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-295101
Entry
Created: 02/10/2025 16:24Updated: 02/21/2025 13:48
Changes: 02/10/2025 16:24 (54), 02/21/2025 13:48 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.