Lexmark Print Management Client up to 3.4.x reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
8.4$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Lexmark Print Management Client up to 3.4.x. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation results in reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2025-1126. The attack is only possible with local access. There is not any exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is advised.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Lexmark Print Management Client up to 3.4.x. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-807. The product uses a protection mechanism that relies on the existence or values of an input, but the input can be modified by an untrusted actor in a way that bypasses the protection mechanism. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:

A Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision vulnerability has been identified in the Lexmark Print Management Client.

The advisory is available at lexmark.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2025-1126 since 02/07/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. Local access is required to approach this attack. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not available.

Upgrading to version 3.5.0 eliminates this vulnerability.

If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

Version

License

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.5
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.4

VulDB Base Score: 7.8
VulDB Temp Score: 7.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CNA Base Score: 9.3
CNA Vector (Lexmark): 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision
CWE: CWE-807 / CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Upgrade: Print Management Client 3.5.0

Timelineinfo

02/07/2025 🔍
02/11/2025 +4 days 🔍
02/11/2025 +0 days 🔍
02/11/2025 +0 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: lexmark.com
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2025-1126 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-1126
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-295386

Entryinfo

Created: 02/11/2025 20:05
Changes: 02/11/2025 20:05 (63)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Might our Artificial Intelligence support you?

Check our Alexa App!