Jack Hopman WPGateway Plugin up to 3.5 on WordPress authentication spoofing
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Jack Hopman WPGateway Plugin up to 3.5 on WordPress. The impacted element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in authentication spoofing. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2022-3180. Additionally, an exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Jack Hopman WPGateway Plugin up to 3.5 on WordPress. This affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a authentication spoofing vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-290. This attack-focused weakness is caused by incorrectly implemented authentication schemes that are subject to spoofing attacks. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The WPGateway Plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation in versions up to, and including, 3.5. This allows unauthenticated attackers to create arbitrary malicious administrator accounts.
The advisory is shared at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2022-3180 since 09/12/2022. The exploitability is told to be easy. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
The exploit is shared for download at wordfence.com. It is declared as highly functional.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Authentication spoofingCWE: CWE-290 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Highly functional
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/12/2022 🔍02/11/2025 🔍
02/12/2025 🔍
03/15/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2022-3180 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-3180
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-295401
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 02/12/2025 00:22Updated: 03/15/2025 01:46
Changes: 02/12/2025 00:22 (57), 03/15/2025 01:46 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.