Microweber 2.0.19 Settings index.php group cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Microweber 2.0.19. It has been rated as problematic. This affects an unknown function of the file userfiles/modules/settings/group/website_group/index.php of the component Settings Handler. The manipulation of the argument group leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2025-2214. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. Furthermore, an exploit is available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Microweber 2.0.19. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects an unknown function of the file userfiles/modules/settings/group/website_group/index.php of the component Settings Handler. The manipulation of the argument group with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Impacted is integrity.
The advisory is shared at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-2214. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
The exploit is available at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. By approaching the search of inurl:userfiles/modules/settings/group/website_group/index.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔍
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔍
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 3.5
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/11/2025 🔍03/11/2025 🔍
07/09/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-2214 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-2214
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-299285
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 03/11/2025 16:04Updated: 07/09/2025 20:08
Changes: 03/11/2025 16:04 (56), 03/12/2025 12:04 (30), 07/09/2025 20:08 (12)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: Fewwords
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #512032: Microweber 2.0.19 Cross Site Scripting (by Fewwords)
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.