yaniiliev All-in-One WP Migration and Backup Plugin up to 7.89 on WordPress replace_serialized_values deserialization
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in yaniiliev All-in-One WP Migration and Backup Plugin up to 7.89 on WordPress. It has been rated as problematic. The affected element is the function replace_serialized_values. This manipulation causes deserialization.
This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2024-10942. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in yaniiliev All-in-One WP Migration and Backup Plugin up to 7.89 on WordPress. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function replace_serialized_values. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a deserialization vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-502. The product deserializes untrusted data without sufficiently verifying that the resulting data will be valid. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The All-in-One WP Migration and Backup plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 7.89 via deserialization of untrusted input in the 'replace_serialized_values' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it could allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code. An administrator must export and restore a backup in order to trigger the exploit.
The weakness was published by Craig Smith. It is possible to read the advisory at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-10942 since 11/06/2024. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 03/13/2025).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 7.0
- 7.1
- 7.2
- 7.3
- 7.4
- 7.5
- 7.6
- 7.7
- 7.8
- 7.9
- 7.10
- 7.11
- 7.12
- 7.13
- 7.14
- 7.15
- 7.16
- 7.17
- 7.18
- 7.19
- 7.20
- 7.21
- 7.22
- 7.23
- 7.24
- 7.25
- 7.26
- 7.27
- 7.28
- 7.29
- 7.30
- 7.31
- 7.32
- 7.33
- 7.34
- 7.35
- 7.36
- 7.37
- 7.38
- 7.39
- 7.40
- 7.41
- 7.42
- 7.43
- 7.44
- 7.45
- 7.46
- 7.47
- 7.48
- 7.49
- 7.50
- 7.51
- 7.52
- 7.53
- 7.54
- 7.55
- 7.56
- 7.57
- 7.58
- 7.59
- 7.60
- 7.61
- 7.62
- 7.63
- 7.64
- 7.65
- 7.66
- 7.67
- 7.68
- 7.69
- 7.70
- 7.71
- 7.72
- 7.73
- 7.74
- 7.75
- 7.76
- 7.77
- 7.78
- 7.79
- 7.80
- 7.81
- 7.82
- 7.83
- 7.84
- 7.85
- 7.86
- 7.87
- 7.88
- 7.89
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Base Score: 5.0
VulDB Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.5
CNA Vector (Wordfence): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: DeserializationCWE: CWE-502 / CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/06/2024 🔍03/13/2025 🔍
03/13/2025 🔍
03/13/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comResearcher: Craig Smith
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-10942 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-10942
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-299635
Entry
Created: 03/13/2025 14:39Changes: 03/13/2025 14:39 (64)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.