Santesoft Sante PACS Server up to 4.1.0 Sante PACS Server.exe path traversal
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Santesoft Sante PACS Server up to 4.1.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the file Sante PACS Server.exe. Performing a manipulation results in path traversal. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2025-2264. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Santesoft Sante PACS Server up to 4.1.0. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown code block of the file Sante PACS Server.exe. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-22. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
A Path Traversal Information Disclosure vulnerability exists in "Sante PACS Server.exe". An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit it to download arbitrary files on the disk drive where the application is installed.
The advisory is shared at tenable.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-2264 since 03/12/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1006 for this issue.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 234076 (Sante PACS Server Path Traversal (CVE-2025-2264)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
Upgrading to version 4.2.0 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Tenable (234076). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.7
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.5
CNA Vector (tenable): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 234076
Nessus Name: Sante PACS Server Path Traversal (CVE-2025-2264)
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Sante PACS Server 4.2.0
Timeline
03/12/2025 🔍03/13/2025 🔍
03/13/2025 🔍
04/10/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: tenable.comStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-2264 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-2264
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-299661
Entry
Created: 03/13/2025 18:50Updated: 04/10/2025 04:32
Changes: 03/13/2025 18:50 (64), 04/04/2025 08:00 (12), 04/10/2025 04:32 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.