Corosync up to 3.1.9 exec/totemsrp.c orf_token_endian_convert stack-based overflow
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Corosync up to 3.1.9. The impacted element is the function orf_token_endian_convert of the file exec/totemsrp.c. This manipulation causes stack-based overflow.
This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2025-30472. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Corosync up to 3.1.9. Affected by this vulnerability is the function orf_token_endian_convert of the file exec/totemsrp.c. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a stack-based overflow vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-121. A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function). As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Corosync through 3.1.9, if encryption is disabled or the attacker knows the encryption key, has a stack-based buffer overflow in orf_token_endian_convert in exec/totemsrp.c via a large UDP packet.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-30472 since 03/22/2025. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 06/07/2025).
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 233752 (SUSE SLES15 / openSUSE 15 Security Update : corosync (SUSE-SU-2025:1084-1)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (233752) and EUVD (EUVD-2025-7198). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.6
VulDB Temp Score: 5.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 9.0
CNA Vector (MITRE): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Stack-based overflowCWE: CWE-121 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 233752
Nessus Name: SUSE SLES15 / openSUSE 15 Security Update : corosync (SUSE-SU-2025:1084-1)
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/22/2025 🔍03/22/2025 🔍
03/22/2025 🔍
06/07/2025 🔍
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: 778
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-30472 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-30472
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-300637
EUVD: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/22/2025 05:35Updated: 06/07/2025 20:01
Changes: 03/22/2025 05:35 (63), 04/02/2025 20:53 (2), 06/07/2025 20:01 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.