fatcatapps Quiz Cat Plugin up to 3.0.8 on WordPress authorization

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
2.6$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in fatcatapps Quiz Cat Plugin up to 3.0.8 on WordPress. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to authorization. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2025-30877. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in fatcatapps Quiz Cat Plugin up to 3.0.8 on WordPress. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a authorization vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-862. The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:

Missing Authorization vulnerability in fatcatapps Quiz Cat allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Quiz Cat: from n/a through 3.0.8.

The weakness was shared by Peter Thaleikis. The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-30877 since 03/26/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 2.7
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 2.7

VulDB Base Score: 2.7
VulDB Temp Score: 2.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CNA Base Score: 2.7
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Authorization
CWE: CWE-862 / CWE-863 / CWE-285
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

03/26/2025 🔍
03/27/2025 +1 days 🔍
03/27/2025 +0 days 🔍
03/27/2025 +0 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: patchstack.com
Researcher: Peter Thaleikis
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2025-30877 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-30877
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-301589

Entryinfo

Created: 03/27/2025 14:40
Changes: 03/27/2025 14:40 (63)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!