emotionalonlinestorytelling Oracle Cards Lite Plugin up to 1.2.1 on WordPress cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in emotionalonlinestorytelling Oracle Cards Lite Plugin up to 1.2.1 on WordPress. It has been rated as problematic. The impacted element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-30852. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in emotionalonlinestorytelling Oracle Cards Lite Plugin up to 1.2.1 on WordPress. This affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in emotionalonlinestorytelling Oracle Cards Lite allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects Oracle Cards Lite: from n/a through 1.2.1.
The weakness was published by João Pedro S Alcântara. The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-30852 since 03/26/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.6
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.1
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/26/2025 🔍04/01/2025 🔍
04/02/2025 🔍
04/02/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: João Pedro S Alcântara
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-30852 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-30852
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-302925
Entry
Created: 04/02/2025 00:32Changes: 04/02/2025 00:32 (64)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.