Inaba Denki Sangyo AC-WPS-11ac Web UI os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Inaba Denki Sangyo AC-WPS-11ac, AC-WPS-11ac-P, AC-WPSM-11ac, AC-WPSM-11ac-P, AC-PD-WPS-11ac and AC-PD-WPS-11ac-P and classified as critical. This affects an unknown part of the component Web UI. The manipulation leads to os command injection. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-25053. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Inaba Denki Sangyo AC-WPS-11ac, AC-WPS-11ac-P, AC-WPSM-11ac, AC-WPSM-11ac-P, AC-PD-WPS-11ac and AC-PD-WPS-11ac-P and classified as critical. This issue affects an unknown part of the component Web UI. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
OS command injection vulnerability in the WEB UI (the setting page) exists in Wi-Fi AP UNIT 'AC-WPS-11ac series'. If exploited, an arbitrary OS command may be executed by a remote attacker who can log in to the product.
The advisory is shared at inaba.co.jp. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-25053 since 03/24/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/09/2025). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.8
VulDB Base Score: 8.8
VulDB Temp Score: 8.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 8.8
CNA Vector (jpcert): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/24/2025 🔍04/09/2025 🔍
04/09/2025 🔍
04/09/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: inaba.co.jpStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-25053 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-25053
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-304097
Entry
Created: 04/09/2025 11:51Updated: 04/09/2025 15:28
Changes: 04/09/2025 11:51 (61), 04/09/2025 15:28 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.