| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Inaba Denki Sangyo AC-WPS-11ac, AC-WPS-11ac-P, AC-WPSM-11ac, AC-WPSM-11ac-P, AC-PD-WPS-11ac and AC-PD-WPS-11ac-P. It has been rated as problematic. The affected element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in ui layer. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2025-25213. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Inaba Denki Sangyo AC-WPS-11ac, AC-WPS-11ac-P, AC-WPSM-11ac, AC-WPSM-11ac-P, AC-PD-WPS-11ac and AC-PD-WPS-11ac-P. This affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a ui layer vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-1021. The web application does not restrict or incorrectly restricts frame objects or UI layers that belong to another application or domain, which can lead to user confusion about which interface the user is interacting with. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Improper restriction of rendered UI layers or frames issue exists in Wi-Fi AP UNIT 'AC-WPS-11ac series'. If a user views and clicks on the content on the malicious page while logged in, unintended operations may be performed.
The advisory is shared at inaba.co.jp. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-25213 since 03/24/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/09/2025).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.5
CNA Vector (jpcert): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Ui layerCWE: CWE-1021
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/24/2025 🔍04/09/2025 🔍
04/09/2025 🔍
04/09/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: inaba.co.jpStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-25213 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-25213
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-304101
Entry
Created: 04/09/2025 11:52Updated: 04/09/2025 15:28
Changes: 04/09/2025 11:52 (60), 04/09/2025 15:28 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.