CrushFTP up to 10.7.1/10.8.4/11.1.0/11.3.1 /WebInterface/function/ port server-side request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in CrushFTP up to 10.7.1/10.8.4/11.1.0/11.3.1. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /WebInterface/function/. This manipulation of the argument port causes server-side request forgery. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2025-32102. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in CrushFTP up to 10.7.1/10.8.4/11.1.0/11.3.1 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /WebInterface/function/. The manipulation of the argument port with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
CrushFTP 9.x and 10.x through 10.8.4 and 11.x through 11.3.1 allows SSRF via the host and port parameters in a command=telnetSocket request to the /WebInterface/function/ URI.
The weakness was disclosed by Rafael Pedrero. It is possible to read the advisory at seclists.org. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-32102. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. Technical details and also a public exploit are known.
It is possible to download the exploit at seclists.org. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2025-10978). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 5.0
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Server-side request forgeryCWE: CWE-918
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/14/2025 🔍04/14/2025 🔍
06/13/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: seclists.orgResearcher: Rafael Pedrero
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-32102 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-32102
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-304627
EUVD: 🔍
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 04/14/2025 14:20Updated: 06/13/2025 15:07
Changes: 04/14/2025 14:20 (55), 05/24/2025 20:46 (1), 06/13/2025 15:07 (13)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.