Stylemix Cost Calculator Builder Plugin up to 3.2.65 on WordPress sql injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Stylemix Cost Calculator Builder Plugin up to 3.2.65 on WordPress. The affected element is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to sql injection. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2025-39587. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Stylemix Cost Calculator Builder Plugin up to 3.2.65 on WordPress. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a sql injection vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-89. The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Stylemix Cost Calculator Builder allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Cost Calculator Builder: from n/a through 3.2.65.
The weakness was released by Trương Hữu Phúc. It is possible to read the advisory at patchstack.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-39587 since 04/16/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/17/2025). The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1505 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 3.2.0
- 3.2.1
- 3.2.2
- 3.2.3
- 3.2.4
- 3.2.5
- 3.2.6
- 3.2.7
- 3.2.8
- 3.2.9
- 3.2.10
- 3.2.11
- 3.2.12
- 3.2.13
- 3.2.14
- 3.2.15
- 3.2.16
- 3.2.17
- 3.2.18
- 3.2.19
- 3.2.20
- 3.2.21
- 3.2.22
- 3.2.23
- 3.2.24
- 3.2.25
- 3.2.26
- 3.2.27
- 3.2.28
- 3.2.29
- 3.2.30
- 3.2.31
- 3.2.32
- 3.2.33
- 3.2.34
- 3.2.35
- 3.2.36
- 3.2.37
- 3.2.38
- 3.2.39
- 3.2.40
- 3.2.41
- 3.2.42
- 3.2.43
- 3.2.44
- 3.2.45
- 3.2.46
- 3.2.47
- 3.2.48
- 3.2.49
- 3.2.50
- 3.2.51
- 3.2.52
- 3.2.53
- 3.2.54
- 3.2.55
- 3.2.56
- 3.2.57
- 3.2.58
- 3.2.59
- 3.2.60
- 3.2.61
- 3.2.62
- 3.2.63
- 3.2.64
- 3.2.65
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.2
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 9.3
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Sql injectionCWE: CWE-89 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/16/2025 🔍04/17/2025 🔍
04/17/2025 🔍
04/17/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Trương Hữu Phúc
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-39587 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-39587
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-305531
Entry
Created: 04/17/2025 18:48Changes: 04/17/2025 18:48 (64)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.