Zyxel AMG1302-T10B 2.00(AAJC.16)C0 Web Management Interface path traversal
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Zyxel AMG1302-T10B 2.00(AAJC.16)C0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Web Management Interface. This manipulation causes path traversal. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2025-3577. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Zyxel AMG1302-T10B 2.00(AAJC.16)C0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Web Management Interface. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-22. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
**UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED** A path traversal vulnerability in the web management interface of the Zyxel AMG1302-T10B firmware version 2.00(AAJC.16)C0 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to access restricted directories by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device.
The advisory is shared at zyxel.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-3577 since 04/14/2025. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation requires an enhanced level of successful authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/22/2025). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1006 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Support
Website
- Vendor: https://www.zyxel.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.8
VulDB Base Score: 2.7
VulDB Temp Score: 2.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.9
CNA Vector (Zyxel): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/14/2025 🔍04/22/2025 🔍
04/22/2025 🔍
04/22/2025 🔍
Sources
Vendor: zyxel.comAdvisory: zyxel.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-3577 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-3577
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-305845
Entry
Created: 04/22/2025 09:37Updated: 04/22/2025 15:19
Changes: 04/22/2025 09:37 (63), 04/22/2025 15:19 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.