Derek Springer BeerXML Shortcode Plugin up to 0.71 on WordPress server-side request forgery

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Derek Springer BeerXML Shortcode Plugin up to 0.71 on WordPress. This affects an unknown function. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2025-46511. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Derek Springer BeerXML Shortcode Plugin up to 0.71 on WordPress and classified as critical. This issue affects an unknown code. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Derek Springer BeerXML Shortcode allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects BeerXML Shortcode: from n/a through 0.71.

The weakness was shared by Ch4r0n. The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-46511 since 04/24/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/24/2025).

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

• WordPress Plugin

Vendor

• Derek Springer

Name

• BeerXML Shortcode Plugin

Version

• 0.1
• 0.2
• 0.3
• 0.4
• 0.5
• 0.6
• 0.7
• 0.8
• 0.9
• 0.10
• 0.11
• 0.12
• 0.13
• 0.14
• 0.15
• 0.16
• 0.17
• 0.18
• 0.19
• 0.20
• 0.21
• 0.22
• 0.23
• 0.24
• 0.25
• 0.26
• 0.27
• 0.28
• 0.29
• 0.30
• 0.31
• 0.32
• 0.33
• 0.34
• 0.35
• 0.36
• 0.37
• 0.38
• 0.39
• 0.40
• 0.41
• 0.42
• 0.43
• 0.44
• 0.45
• 0.46
• 0.47
• 0.48
• 0.49
• 0.50
• 0.51
• 0.52
• 0.53
• 0.54
• 0.55
• 0.56
• 0.57
• 0.58
• 0.59
• 0.60
• 0.61
• 0.62
• 0.63
• 0.64
• 0.65
• 0.66
• 0.67
• 0.68
• 0.69
• 0.70
• 0.71

CPE 2.3info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CPE 2.2info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CVSSv4info

CVSSv3info

CVSSv2info

Exploitinginfo

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Countermeasuresinfo

Timelineinfo

Sourcesinfo

Entryinfo

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion