CGI-RESCUE FORM2MAIL 1.21

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
5.0$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability has been found in CGI-RESCUE FORM2MAIL 1.21 and classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. This manipulation causes an unknown weakness. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2006-2944. There is no available exploit.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in CGI-RESCUE FORM2MAIL 1.21. It has been declared as problematic. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:

Unspecified vulnerability in CGI-RESCUE FORM2MAIL 1.21 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject email headers, which facilitates sending spam messages. NOTE: the details for this issue are obtained from third party information.

The weakness was presented 06/12/2006 (Website). The advisory is shared at jvn.jp. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2006-2944 since 06/12/2006. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.

It is declared as proof-of-concept.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (27130), SecurityFocus (BID 18434†) and Secunia (SA20515†). See VDB-30732 for similar entry. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.0

VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Unknown
CWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

06/09/2006 🔍
06/09/2006 +0 days 🔍
06/12/2006 +3 days 🔍
06/12/2006 +0 days 🔍
06/12/2006 +0 days 🔍
03/12/2015 +3195 days 🔍
07/28/2018 +1234 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: jvn.jp
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2006-2944 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2006-2944
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-30733
X-Force: 27130 - FORM2MAIL and WebFORM email header injection
SecurityFocus: 18434
Secunia: 20515 - WebFORM and FORM2MAIL Mail Header Injection Vulnerability, Moderately Critical
Vupen: ADV-2006-2234

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/12/2015 14:25
Updated: 07/28/2018 08:43
Changes: 03/12/2015 14:25 (48), 07/28/2018 08:43 (7)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!