Ditty Plugin up to 3.1.51 on WordPress Setting cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Ditty Plugin up to 3.1.51 on WordPress. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Setting Handler. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-13357. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Ditty Plugin up to 3.1.51 on WordPress. It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown processing of the component Setting Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
The Ditty WordPress plugin before 3.1.52 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as author to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup).
The advisory is shared at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-13357 since 01/13/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
Version
- 3.1.0
- 3.1.1
- 3.1.2
- 3.1.3
- 3.1.4
- 3.1.5
- 3.1.6
- 3.1.7
- 3.1.8
- 3.1.9
- 3.1.10
- 3.1.11
- 3.1.12
- 3.1.13
- 3.1.14
- 3.1.15
- 3.1.16
- 3.1.17
- 3.1.18
- 3.1.19
- 3.1.20
- 3.1.21
- 3.1.22
- 3.1.23
- 3.1.24
- 3.1.25
- 3.1.26
- 3.1.27
- 3.1.28
- 3.1.29
- 3.1.30
- 3.1.31
- 3.1.32
- 3.1.33
- 3.1.34
- 3.1.35
- 3.1.36
- 3.1.37
- 3.1.38
- 3.1.39
- 3.1.40
- 3.1.41
- 3.1.42
- 3.1.43
- 3.1.44
- 3.1.45
- 3.1.46
- 3.1.47
- 3.1.48
- 3.1.49
- 3.1.50
- 3.1.51
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/13/2025 🔍05/09/2025 🔍
05/09/2025 🔍
06/10/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2024-13357 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-13357
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-308265
Entry
Created: 05/10/2025 00:04Updated: 06/10/2025 16:09
Changes: 05/10/2025 00:04 (52), 06/10/2025 16:09 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.