| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in MyScrapbook 3.1. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component Error Message Handler. This manipulation causes information disclosure. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2006-3034. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in MyScrapbook 3.1 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Error Message Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
MyScrapbook 3.1 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a direct request to files in the txt-db-api directory such as txt-db-api/sql.php, which reveals the path in an error message.
The weakness was shared 06/11/2006 by luny (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2006-3034 since 06/15/2006. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are unknown but an exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
After even before and not, there has been an exploit disclosed. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (27165), OSVDB (26414†) and Secunia (SA20599†). The entry VDB-30828 is related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Information disclosureCWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/11/2006 🔍06/11/2006 🔍
06/13/2006 🔍
06/13/2006 🔍
06/15/2006 🔍
06/15/2006 🔍
03/12/2015 🔍
07/29/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: luny
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2006-3034 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2006-3034
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-30829
X-Force: 27165 - MyScrapbook txt-db-api/sql.php path disclosure
Secunia: 20599 - MyScrapbook Script Insertion Vulnerabilities, Moderately Critical
OSVDB: 26414 - MyScrapbook txt-db-api/ Directory Multiple Script Direct Request Path Disclosure
Vupen: ADV-2006-2311
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/12/2015 14:25Updated: 07/29/2018 12:42
Changes: 03/12/2015 14:25 (52), 07/29/2018 12:42 (8)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.