10Web Form Maker Plugin up to 1.15.32 on WordPress Setting cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 2.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in 10Web Form Maker Plugin up to 1.15.32 on WordPress. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component Setting Handler. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2024-13053. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in 10Web Form Maker Plugin up to 1.15.32 on WordPress and classified as problematic. This issue affects an unknown code of the component Setting Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
The Form Maker by 10Web WordPress plugin before 1.15.33 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup).
The weakness was presented by Dmitrii Ignatyev. The advisory is shared at wpscan.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-13053 since 12/30/2024. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are necessary for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 1.15.33 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 1.15.0
- 1.15.1
- 1.15.2
- 1.15.3
- 1.15.4
- 1.15.5
- 1.15.6
- 1.15.7
- 1.15.8
- 1.15.9
- 1.15.10
- 1.15.11
- 1.15.12
- 1.15.13
- 1.15.14
- 1.15.15
- 1.15.16
- 1.15.17
- 1.15.18
- 1.15.19
- 1.15.20
- 1.15.21
- 1.15.22
- 1.15.23
- 1.15.24
- 1.15.25
- 1.15.26
- 1.15.27
- 1.15.28
- 1.15.29
- 1.15.30
- 1.15.31
- 1.15.32
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 2.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 2.3
VulDB Base Score: 2.4
VulDB Temp Score: 2.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Form Maker Plugin 1.15.33
Timeline
12/30/2024 🔍05/16/2025 🔍
05/16/2025 🔍
06/10/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: wpscan.comResearcher: Dmitrii Ignatyev
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2024-13053 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-13053
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-309173
Entry
Created: 05/16/2025 08:24Updated: 06/10/2025 09:18
Changes: 05/16/2025 08:24 (58), 06/10/2025 09:18 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.