Photo Gallery, Images, Slider in Rbs Image Gallery Plugin Setting cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 2.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Photo Gallery, Images, Slider in Rbs Image Gallery Plugin up to 3.2.23 on WordPress. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Setting Handler. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2024-13384. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Photo Gallery, Images, Slider in Rbs Image Gallery Plugin up to 3.2.23 on WordPress. This affects some unknown processing of the component Setting Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
The Photo Gallery, Images, Slider in Rbs Image Gallery WordPress plugin before 3.2.24 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup).
The weakness was shared by Krugov Artyom. The advisory is shared at wpscan.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-13384 since 01/14/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 3.2.24 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
- 3.2.0
- 3.2.1
- 3.2.2
- 3.2.3
- 3.2.4
- 3.2.5
- 3.2.6
- 3.2.7
- 3.2.8
- 3.2.9
- 3.2.10
- 3.2.11
- 3.2.12
- 3.2.13
- 3.2.14
- 3.2.15
- 3.2.16
- 3.2.17
- 3.2.18
- 3.2.19
- 3.2.20
- 3.2.21
- 3.2.22
- 3.2.23
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 2.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 2.3
VulDB Base Score: 2.4
VulDB Temp Score: 2.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Photo Gallery, Images, Slider in Rbs Image Gallery Plugin 3.2.24
Timeline
01/14/2025 🔍05/16/2025 🔍
05/16/2025 🔍
05/16/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: wpscan.comResearcher: Krugov Artyom
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2024-13384 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-13384
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-309189
Entry
Created: 05/16/2025 08:34Changes: 05/16/2025 08:34 (57)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.