Syncpilot Live Contract up to 5.4.11/5.5.3/5.6.2 path traversal
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Syncpilot Live Contract up to 5.4.11/5.5.3/5.6.2 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. This manipulation causes path traversal. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2025-2305. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists. The affected component should be upgraded.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Syncpilot Live Contract up to 5.4.11/5.5.3/5.6.2. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-22. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
A Path traversal vulnerability in the file download functionality was identified. This vulnerability allows unauthenticated users to download arbitrary files, in the context of the application server, from the Linux server.
The advisory is shared at cirosec.de. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-2305 since 03/14/2025. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1006 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 5.4.12, 5.5.4 or 5.6.3 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2025-15430). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.8
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 8.6
CNA Vector (cirosec): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Live Contract 5.4.12/5.5.4/5.6.3
Timeline
03/14/2025 🔍05/16/2025 🔍
05/16/2025 🔍
05/16/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: cirosec.deStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-2305 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-2305
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-309277
EUVD: 🔍
Entry
Created: 05/16/2025 15:02Updated: 05/16/2025 16:02
Changes: 05/16/2025 15:02 (64), 05/16/2025 16:02 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.