| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Mozilla Firefox up to 138. It has been declared as problematic. The impacted element is an unknown function. Executing a manipulation can lead to cleartext transmission. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2025-5270. The attack can be launched remotely. No exploit exists. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Mozilla Firefox up to 138. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cleartext transmission vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-319. The product transmits sensitive or security-critical data in cleartext in a communication channel that can be sniffed by unauthorized actors. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. CVE summarizes:
In certain cases, SNI could have been sent unencrypted even when encrypted DNS was enabled. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 139 and Thunderbird 139.
The advisory is shared for download at bugzilla.mozilla.org. This vulnerability was named CVE-2025-5270 since 05/27/2025. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is required for a successful exploitation. There are neither technical details nor an exploit publicly available. The current price for an exploit might be approx. USD $0-$5k (estimation calculated on 10/01/2026). The MITRE ATT&CK project declares the attack technique as T1040.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 237299 (Mozilla Firefox < 139.0), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
Upgrading to version 139 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (237299) and CERT Bund (WID-SEC-2025-1850). Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Affected
- Xerox FreeFlow Print Server
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.mozilla.org/
- Product: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.5
VulDB Base Score: 3.7
VulDB Temp Score: 3.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
ADP CISA Base Score: 7.5
ADP CISA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cleartext transmissionCWE: CWE-319 / CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 237299
Nessus Name: Mozilla Firefox < 139.0
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Firefox 139
Timeline
05/27/2025 🔍05/27/2025 🔍
05/27/2025 🔍
10/01/2026 🔍
Sources
Vendor: mozilla.orgProduct: mozilla.org
Advisory: bugzilla.mozilla.org
Status: Confirmed
CNA: mozilla
CVE: CVE-2025-5270 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-5270
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-310372
CERT Bund: WID-SEC-2025-1850 - Xerox FreeFlow Print Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff
Entry
Created: 05/27/2025 15:12Updated: 10/01/2026 10:27
Changes: 05/27/2025 15:12 (55), 05/28/2025 04:57 (2), 06/11/2025 15:08 (1), 08/17/2025 00:23 (7), 10/01/2026 10:27 (14)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.

No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.