Tinxy WiFi Lock Controller 1 Phone Number cleartext storage
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Tinxy WiFi Lock Controller 1. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Phone Number Handler. This manipulation causes cleartext storage. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2025-44614. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Tinxy WiFi Lock Controller 1. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the component Phone Number Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cleartext storage vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-312. The product stores sensitive information in cleartext within a resource that might be accessible to another control sphere. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Tinxy WiFi Lock Controller v1 RF was discovered to store users' sensitive information, including credentials and mobile phone numbers, in plaintext.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-44614 since 04/22/2025. The exploitation appears to be easy. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1555 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cleartext storageCWE: CWE-312 / CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/22/2025 🔍05/30/2025 🔍
05/30/2025 🔍
05/31/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-44614 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-44614
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-310597
Entry
Created: 05/30/2025 05:53Updated: 05/31/2025 07:19
Changes: 05/30/2025 05:53 (54), 05/31/2025 07:19 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.