Razer Synapse up to 4.0.86.250218 COM Interface razer_elevation_service.exe Local Privilege Escalation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Razer Synapse up to 4.0.86.250218. Impacted is an unknown function of the file razer_elevation_service.exe of the component COM Interface. This manipulation causes an unknown weakness. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2025-27811. The attack requires local access. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Razer Synapse up to 4.0.86.250218. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality of the file razer_elevation_service.exe of the component COM Interface. The impact remains unknown. The summary by CVE is:
A local privilege escalation in the razer_elevation_service.exe in Razer Synapse 4 through 4.0.86.2502180127 allows a local attacker to escalate their privileges via a vulnerable COM interface in the target service.
The advisory is shared at app.inspectiv.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-27811 since 03/07/2025. The exploitation appears to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2025-16873). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Local Privilege EscalationCWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/07/2025 🔍06/04/2025 🔍
06/04/2025 🔍
06/04/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: app.inspectiv.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-27811 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-27811
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-311173
EUVD: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/04/2025 16:53Updated: 06/04/2025 17:24
Changes: 06/04/2025 16:53 (52), 06/04/2025 17:24 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.