Microhard IPn4Gii/Bullet-LTE up to 1.2.0-r1132 AT+MFMAC Command argument injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Microhard IPn4Gii and Bullet-LTE up to 1.2.0-r1132. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component AT+MFMAC Command Handler. Such manipulation leads to argument injection. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-35005. Local access is required to approach this attack. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Microhard IPn4Gii and Bullet-LTE up to 1.2.0-r1132. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component AT+MFMAC Command Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a argument injection vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-88. The product constructs a string for a command to be executed by a separate component
in another control sphere, but it does not properly delimit the
intended arguments, options, or switches within that command string. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:
Products that incorporate the Microhard BulletLTE-NA2 and IPn4Gii-NA2 are vulnerable to a post-authentication command injection issue in the AT+MFMAC command that can lead to privilege escalation. This is an instance of CWE-88, "Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')," and is estimated as a CVSS 7.1 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). This issue has not been generally fixed at the time of this CVE record's first publishing.
The weakness was disclosed by Ricky Lawshae. The advisory is available at takeonme.org. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2025-35005 since 04/15/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. Local access is required to approach this attack. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not available. This vulnerability is assigned to T1059 by the MITRE ATT&CK project.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2025-17403). If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.1
CNA Vector (AHA): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Argument injectionCWE: CWE-88 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/15/2025 🔍06/09/2025 🔍
06/09/2025 🔍
01/12/2026 🔍
Sources
Advisory: takeonme.orgResearcher: Ricky Lawshae
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-35005 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-35005
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-311642
EUVD: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/09/2025 07:13Updated: 01/12/2026 18:00
Changes: 06/09/2025 07:13 (45), 06/09/2025 07:15 (24), 06/09/2025 08:22 (1), 01/12/2026 18:00 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.