NixOS Nix up to 2.24.15/2.26.4/2.28.4/2.29.1 improper ownership management
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 2.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in NixOS Nix up to 2.24.15/2.26.4/2.28.4/2.29.1. It has been classified as problematic. Impacted is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to improper ownership management. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2025-46416. The attack can only be performed from a local environment. No exploit is available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in NixOS Nix up to 2.24.15/2.26.4/2.28.4/2.29.1. This issue affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper ownership management vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-282. The product assigns the wrong ownership, or does not properly verify the ownership, of an object or resource. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
The Nix, Lix, and Guix package managers allow a bypass of build isolation in which a user can elevate their privileges to the build user account (e.g., nixbld or guixbuild). This affects Nix through 2.24.15, 2.26.4, 2.28.4, and 2.29.1; Lix through 2.91.2, 2.92.2, and 2.93.1; and Guix before 1.4.0-38.0e79d5b.
The advisory is shared at discourse.nixos.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-46416 since 04/24/2025. The exploitation is known to be difficult. An attack has to be approached locally. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 259387 (Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2025-46416), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (259387) and EUVD (EUVD-2025-19410). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 2.24.0
- 2.24.1
- 2.24.2
- 2.24.3
- 2.24.4
- 2.24.5
- 2.24.6
- 2.24.7
- 2.24.8
- 2.24.9
- 2.24.10
- 2.24.11
- 2.24.12
- 2.24.13
- 2.24.14
- 2.24.15
- 2.26.0
- 2.26.1
- 2.26.2
- 2.26.3
- 2.26.4
- 2.28.0
- 2.28.1
- 2.28.2
- 2.28.3
- 2.28.4
- 2.29.0
- 2.29.1
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 2.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 2.6
VulDB Base Score: 2.5
VulDB Temp Score: 2.4
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 2.9
CNA Vector (MITRE): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper ownership managementCWE: CWE-282 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 259387
Nessus Name: Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2025-46416
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
04/24/2025 CVE reserved06/27/2025 Advisory disclosed
06/27/2025 VulDB entry created
08/31/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: discourse.nixos.orgStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-46416 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-46416
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-314165
EUVD: 🔒
Entry
Created: 06/27/2025 17:22Updated: 08/31/2025 09:40
Changes: 06/27/2025 17:22 (61), 06/28/2025 06:47 (1), 08/31/2025 09:40 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.