Endress+Hauser MEAC300-FNADE4 up to 0.16.0 credentials storage
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Endress+Hauser MEAC300-FNADE4 up to 0.16.0. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. Performing a manipulation results in credentials storage. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2025-1709. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Endress+Hauser MEAC300-FNADE4 up to 0.16.0. This affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a credentials storage vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-256. Storing a password in plaintext may result in a system compromise. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Several credentials for the local PostgreSQL database are stored in plain text (partially base64 encoded).
This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-1709 since 02/26/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1552 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 0.17.0 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2025-19856). Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.5
CNA Vector (SICK AG): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Credentials storageCWE: CWE-256 / CWE-255
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: MEAC300-FNADE4 0.17.0
Timeline
02/26/2025 🔍07/03/2025 🔍
07/03/2025 🔍
02/06/2026 🔍
Sources
Status: ConfirmedCVE: CVE-2025-1709 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-1709
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-314769
EUVD: 🔍
Entry
Created: 07/03/2025 15:59Updated: 02/06/2026 16:37
Changes: 07/03/2025 15:59 (62), 07/03/2025 16:40 (1), 02/06/2026 16:37 (12)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.