mbed TLS up to 3.6.3 mbedtls_lms_verify missing cryptographic step
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in mbed TLS up to 3.6.3. The affected element is the function mbedtls_lms_verify. The manipulation leads to missing cryptographic step.
This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2025-49600. It is possible to launch the attack on the physical device. There is no exploit available.
It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in mbed TLS up to 3.6.3 and classified as problematic. This issue affects the function mbedtls_lms_verify. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a missing cryptographic step vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-325. The product does not implement a required step in a cryptographic algorithm, resulting in weaker encryption than advertised by the algorithm. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
In MbedTLS 3.3.0 before 3.6.4, mbedtls_lms_verify may accept invalid signatures if hash computation fails and internal errors go unchecked, enabling LMS (Leighton-Micali Signature) forgery in a fault scenario. Specifically, unchecked return values in mbedtls_lms_verify allow an attacker (who can induce a hardware hash accelerator fault) to bypass LMS signature verification by reusing stale stack data, resulting in acceptance of an invalid signature. In mbedtls_lms_verify, the return values of the internal Merkle tree functions create_merkle_leaf_value and create_merkle_internal_value are not checked. These functions return an integer that indicates whether the call succeeded or not. If a failure occurs, the output buffer (Tc_candidate_root_node) may remain uninitialized, and the result of the signature verification is unpredictable. When the software implementation of SHA-256 is used, these functions will not fail. However, with hardware-accelerated hashing, an attacker could use fault injection against the accelerator to bypass verification.
The advisory is shared at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-49600 since 06/06/2025. The exploitation is known to be difficult. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1600 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 3.6.4 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2025-20080). Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Base Score: 2.0
VulDB Temp Score: 1.9
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.9
CNA Vector (MITRE): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Missing cryptographic stepCWE: CWE-325
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Yes
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: mbed TLS 3.6.4
Timeline
06/06/2025 CVE reserved07/04/2025 Advisory disclosed
07/04/2025 VulDB entry created
06/06/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-49600 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-49600
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-314969
EUVD: 🔒
Entry
Created: 07/04/2025 18:49Updated: 06/06/2026 04:01
Changes: 07/04/2025 18:49 (62), 07/04/2025 19:12 (1), 06/06/2026 04:01 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.