Belkin F9K1122 1.00.33 webs /goform/formSetWanStatic os command injection

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Belkin F9K1122 1.00.33. Affected is the function formSetWanStatic of the file /goform/formSetWanStatic of the component webs. This manipulation of the argument m_wan_ipaddr/m_wan_netmask/m_wan_gateway/m_wan_staticdns1/m_wan_staticdns2 is directly passed by the attacker/so we can control the m_wan_ipaddr/m_wan_netmask/m_wan_gateway/m_wan_staticdns1/m_wan_staticdns2 causes os command injection. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2025-7081. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. Furthermore, an exploit is available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability has been found in Belkin F9K1122 1.00.33 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function formSetWanStatic of the file /goform/formSetWanStatic of the component webs. The manipulation of the argument m_wan_ipaddr/m_wan_netmask/m_wan_gateway/m_wan_staticdns1/m_wan_staticdns2 is directly passed by the attacker/so we can control the m_wan_ipaddr/m_wan_netmask/m_wan_gateway/m_wan_staticdns1/m_wan_staticdns2 with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-7081. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1202 according to MITRE ATT&CK.

It is possible to download the exploit at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2025-20140). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

License

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0

VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CNA Base Score: 6.3
CNA Vector: 🔒

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Os command injection
CWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒

EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔒

Timelineinfo

07/05/2025 Advisory disclosed
07/05/2025 +0 days VulDB entry created
07/06/2025 +1 days VulDB entry last update

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: github.com
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2025-7081 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-7081
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-314995
EUVD: 🔒
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013

Entryinfo

Created: 07/05/2025 17:30
Updated: 07/06/2025 17:33
Changes: 07/05/2025 17:30 (58), 07/06/2025 16:28 (30), 07/06/2025 17:33 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: Bond
Cache ID: 216::103

Submitinfo

Accepted

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Do you know our Splunk app?

Download it now for free!