Honeywell C300 PCNT02 Control Data Access wrong handler
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Honeywell C300 PCNT02, C300 PCNT05, FIM4, FIM8, UOC, CN100, HCA, C300PM, C200E and Wireless Device Manager. Affected is an unknown function of the component Control Data Access. This manipulation causes wrong handler. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2025-3946. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Honeywell C300 PCNT02, C300 PCNT05, FIM4, FIM8, UOC, CN100, HCA, C300PM, C200E and Wireless Device Manager. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Control Data Access. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a wrong handler vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-430. The wrong "handler" is assigned to process an object. As an impact it is known to affect integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The Honeywell Experion PKS and OneWireless WDM contains a Deployment of Wrong Handler vulnerability in the component Control Data Access (CDA). An attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Input Data Manipulation, which could result in incorrect handling of packets leading to remote code execution. Honeywell recommends updating to the most recent version of Honeywell Experion PKS:520.2 TCU9 HF1 and 530.1 TCU3 HF1 and OneWireless: 322.5 and 331.1. The affected Experion PKS products are C300 PCNT02, C300 PCNT05, FIM4, FIM8, UOC, CN100, HCA, C300PM, and C200E. The Experion PKS versions affected are from 520.1 through 520.2 TCU9 and from 530 through 530 TCU3. The OneWireless WDM affected versions are 322.1 through 322.4 and 330.1 through 330.3.
This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-3946 since 04/25/2025. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 07/11/2025).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Base Score: 6.5
VulDB Temp Score: 6.5
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 8.2
CNA Vector (Honeywell): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Wrong handlerCWE: CWE-430
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
04/25/2025 CVE reserved07/11/2025 Advisory disclosed
07/11/2025 VulDB entry created
07/11/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Status: ConfirmedCVE: CVE-2025-3946 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-3946
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-316051
Entry
Created: 07/11/2025 06:55Changes: 07/11/2025 06:55 (59)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.