RVC-Boss GPT-SoVITS up to 20250228v3 webui.py change_label command injection

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in RVC-Boss GPT-SoVITS up to 20250228v3. It has been rated as critical. This affects the function change_label of the file webui.py. Performing a manipulation results in command injection. This vulnerability was named CVE-2025-49836. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in RVC-Boss GPT-SoVITS up to 20250228v3. This affects the function change_label of the file webui.py. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a command injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-77. The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

GPT-SoVITS-WebUI is a voice conversion and text-to-speech webUI. In versions 20250228v3 and prior, there is a command injection vulnerability in webui.py change_label function. path_list takes user input, which is passed to the change_label function, which concatenates the user input into a command and runs it on the server, leading to arbitrary command execution. At time of publication, no known patched versions are available.

The advisory is shared at securitylab.github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-49836 since 06/11/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 07/31/2025). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

• Artificial Intelligence Software

Vendor

• RVC-Boss

Name

• GPT-SoVITS

Version

• 20250228v3

CPE 2.3info

• 🔒
• 🔒

CPE 2.2info

• 🔒
• 🔒

CVSSv4info

CVSSv3info

CVSSv2info

Exploitinginfo

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Countermeasuresinfo

Timelineinfo

Sourcesinfo

Entryinfo

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion