MB Connect Line mbNET.mini up to 2.3.2 os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in MB Connect Line mbNET.mini up to 2.3.2. This issue affects some unknown processing. This manipulation causes os command injection. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2025-41674. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in MB Connect Line mbNET.mini up to 2.3.2 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
A high privileged remote attacker can execute arbitrary system commands via POST requests in the diagnostic action due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
The weakness was released by F. Bruckmoser, M. Eder, J. Heigl, M. Heudorn, G. Hofmarcher, M. Kadlec, M. Pristauz-telsnigg, S. Resch, P. Schweinzer and M. Gschiel as VDE-2025-058. The advisory is shared at certvde.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-41674 since 04/16/2025. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation needs additional levels of successful authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 2.3.3 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2025-22069). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Base Score: 7.2
VulDB Temp Score: 6.9
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.2
CNA Vector (CERTVDE): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: mbNET.mini 2.3.3
Timeline
04/16/2025 CVE reserved07/21/2025 Advisory disclosed
07/21/2025 VulDB entry created
11/07/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: VDE-2025-058Researcher: F. Bruckmoser, M. Eder, J. Heigl, M. Heudorn, G. Hofmarcher, M. Kadlec, M. Pristauz-telsnigg, S. Resch, P. Schweinzer, M. Gschiel
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-41674 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-41674
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-317101
EUVD: 🔒
Entry
Created: 07/21/2025 12:02Updated: 11/07/2025 14:21
Changes: 07/21/2025 12:02 (65), 07/21/2025 14:19 (1), 11/07/2025 14:21 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.