MB Connect Line mbNET.mini up to 2.3.2 HTTP POST Request cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in MB Connect Line mbNET.mini up to 2.3.2. It has been rated as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation causes cross site scripting. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2025-41681. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists. Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in MB Connect Line mbNET.mini up to 2.3.2. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
A high privileged remote attacker can gain persistent XSS via POST requests due to improper neutralization of special elements used to create dynamic content.
The weakness was disclosed by F. Bruckmoser, M. Eder, J. Heigl, M. Heudorn, G. Hofmarcher, M. Kadlec, M. Pristauz-telsnigg, S. Resch, P. Schweinzer and M. Gschiel as VDE-2025-058. It is possible to read the advisory at certvde.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-41681 since 04/16/2025. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are required for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
Upgrading to version 2.3.3 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2025-22073). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Base Score: 2.4
VulDB Temp Score: 2.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.8
CNA Vector (CERTVDE): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: mbNET.mini 2.3.3
Timeline
04/16/2025 CVE reserved07/21/2025 Advisory disclosed
07/21/2025 VulDB entry created
11/07/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: VDE-2025-058Researcher: F. Bruckmoser, M. Eder, J. Heigl, M. Heudorn, G. Hofmarcher, M. Kadlec, M. Pristauz-telsnigg, S. Resch, P. Schweinzer, M. Gschiel
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-41681 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-41681
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-317107
EUVD: 🔒
Entry
Created: 07/21/2025 12:05Updated: 11/07/2025 15:18
Changes: 07/21/2025 12:05 (66), 07/21/2025 14:26 (1), 11/07/2025 15:18 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.