| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in halfgaar FlashMQ 1.14.0. Affected by this issue is the function PublishCopyFactory::getNewPublish. Performing a manipulation of the argument QoS results in assertion.
This vulnerability was named CVE-2024-42644. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in halfgaar FlashMQ 1.14.0. This affects the function PublishCopyFactory::getNewPublish. The manipulation of the argument QoS with an unknown input leads to a assertion vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-617. The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
FlashMQ v1.14.0 was discovered to contain an assertion failure in the function PublishCopyFactory::getNewPublish, which occurs when the QoS value of the publish object is greater than 0.
This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-42644 since 08/05/2024. The exploitability is told to be easy. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: AssertionCWE: CWE-617
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
08/05/2024 CVE reserved07/29/2025 Advisory disclosed
07/29/2025 VulDB entry created
07/31/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Status: Not definedCVE: CVE-2024-42644 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2024-42644
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-318033
Entry
Created: 07/29/2025 17:56Updated: 07/31/2025 02:34
Changes: 07/29/2025 17:56 (52), 07/31/2025 02:34 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.