Apple macOS up to 13.6/14.6/15.3 Shortcut App Setting information disclosure

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Apple macOS up to 13.6/14.6/15.3. This affects an unknown part of the component Shortcut App Setting Handler. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2025-43184. The attack needs to be performed locally. There is not any exploit available. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Apple macOS up to 13.6/14.6/15.3. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects an unknown functionality of the component Shortcut App Setting Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
This issue was addressed by adding an additional prompt for user consent. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.7.7, macOS Ventura 13.7.7, macOS Sequoia 15.4. A shortcut may be able to bypass sensitive Shortcuts app settings.
The advisory is shared at support.apple.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-43184 since 04/16/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 243002 (macOS 14.x < 14.7.7 Multiple Vulnerabilities (124150)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
Upgrading to version 13.7, 14.7 or 15.4 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (243002) and EUVD (EUVD-2025-23131). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.apple.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Information disclosureCWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 243002
Nessus Name: macOS 14.x < 14.7.7 Multiple Vulnerabilities (124150)
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: macOS 13.7/14.7/15.4
Timeline
04/16/2025 CVE reserved07/30/2025 Advisory disclosed
07/30/2025 VulDB entry created
08/02/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: apple.comAdvisory: support.apple.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-43184 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-43184
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-318221
EUVD: 🔒
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20180712
Entry
Created: 07/30/2025 08:32Updated: 08/02/2025 16:32
Changes: 07/30/2025 08:32 (57), 07/31/2025 21:17 (1), 08/01/2025 10:08 (1), 08/02/2025 16:32 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.