Shenzhen Aitemi M300 Wi-Fi Repeater MT02 WPA2 Configuration key os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Shenzhen Aitemi M300 Wi-Fi Repeater MT02. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component WPA2 Configuration. This manipulation of the argument key causes os command injection. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2025-34149. The attack requires access to the local network. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Shenzhen Aitemi M300 Wi-Fi Repeater MT02. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the component WPA2 Configuration. The manipulation of the argument key with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
A command injection vulnerability affects the Shenzhen Aitemi M300 Wi-Fi Repeater (hardware model MT02) during WPA2 configuration. The 'key' parameter is interpreted directly by the system shell, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root. Exploitation requires no authentication and can be triggered during wireless setup.
The weakness was published by Valentin Lobstein. The advisory is shared at chocapikk.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-34149 since 04/15/2025. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack needs to approached within the local network. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 08/07/2025). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.8
VulDB Base Score: 8.8
VulDB Temp Score: 8.8
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
04/15/2025 CVE reserved08/07/2025 Advisory disclosed
08/07/2025 VulDB entry created
08/07/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: chocapikk.comResearcher: Valentin Lobstein
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-34149 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-34149
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-319165
Entry
Created: 08/07/2025 21:09Changes: 08/07/2025 21:09 (67)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.