KuWFi GC111 3.0_20191211 POST goform_set_cmd_process SSID improper authentication
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in KuWFi GC111 3.0_20191211 and classified as critical. This affects an unknown function of the file /goform/goform_set_cmd_process of the component POST Handler. The manipulation of the argument SSID leads to improper authentication. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2025-43984. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in KuWFi GC111 3.0_20191211. This issue affects an unknown part of the file /goform/goform_set_cmd_process of the component POST Handler. The manipulation of the argument SSID with an unknown input leads to a improper authentication vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-287. When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
An issue was discovered on KuWFi GC111 devices (Hardware Version: CPE-LM321_V3.2, Software Version: GC111-GL-LM321_V3.0_20191211). They are vulnerable to unauthenticated /goform/goform_set_cmd_process requests. A crafted POST request, using the SSID parameter, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands with root privileges.
The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-43984 since 04/21/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 08/14/2025).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper authenticationCWE: CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
04/21/2025 CVE reserved08/14/2025 Advisory disclosed
08/14/2025 VulDB entry created
08/14/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Status: Not definedCVE: CVE-2025-43984 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-43984
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-320141
Entry
Created: 08/14/2025 16:32Changes: 08/14/2025 16:32 (54)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.