Unisoc UWS6152 Engineer Mode Service command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Unisoc SL8521E, SL8521ET, SL8541E, UIS8141E, UWS6137, UWS6137E, UWS6151 and UWS6152. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Engineer Mode Service. Performing a manipulation results in command injection. This vulnerability was named CVE-2025-31713. The attack needs to be approached locally. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Unisoc SL8521E, SL8521ET, SL8541E, UIS8141E, UWS6137, UWS6137E, UWS6151 and UWS6152. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown functionality of the component Engineer Mode Service. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a command injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-77. The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
In engineer mode service, there is a possible command injection due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed.
The advisory is shared at unisoc.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-31713 since 04/01/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 08/18/2025). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.1
VulDB Base Score: 7.8
VulDB Temp Score: 7.8
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 8.4
CNA Vector (Unisoc): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Command injectionCWE: CWE-77 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
04/01/2025 CVE reserved08/18/2025 Advisory disclosed
08/18/2025 VulDB entry created
08/18/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: unisoc.comStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-31713 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-31713
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-320433
Entry
Created: 08/18/2025 07:54Changes: 08/18/2025 07:54 (62)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.